Friday, 24 February 2017

Premarital sex, or, how to destroy people by giving them freedom.

The best way to destroy a tall and secure building is to attack the foundations. You accomplish two things by doing so. The first is that you avoid what protects it, and second you turn its strength and majesty against it. Without the proper foundations, the building falls under its own weight.

So it is with societies. To destroy one, you should not merely fight a war or the like. They can withstand such more than an individual can. Instead, one must destroy the foundations of the society. What is the foundation of Western Civilisation? It is, in fact, the same foundation as all civilisation – marriage and the family. So the end goal of the enemies of Western Civilisation is to destroy both.

One of their chief weapons in this war is pre-marital sex. What this does is it attacks the human being in three ways. First it attacks them spiritually. It says that you are no different from the animals that rut in the fields, unable to choose yay or nay. Secondly it attacks them mentally. It hurts them and creates false bonds in their mind. Thirdly it attacks them practically. It leads to a higher divorce rate, and more failed relationships leaving them impoverished.

Let us examine these in order, then. Why does pre-marital sex attack you spiritually? It does so by saying that you are no more than your body, and your body’s desires. How is this so? The concept of pre-marital sex is, in effect, the same as adultery. You are saying that you cannot control your desires, and keep to what is good. Instead, you simply must resort to what you or your body wants. In effect, you are turned from objective morality into relativism. What is right for you may not be right for someone else – perhaps they are homosexual, or under-age, or whatsoever the particulars may be – but it is not because the act itself is wrong. In effect, it is saying whatever is comfortable is good. Yet if you examine all of human history, up until this time nobody has thought of that as the case. It was always the person who did the difficult thing, who made the personal sacrifice, that was the hero. This man chose outside of his comfort, outside of his desires. That was why he was heroic, why he was lionised. Now we turn it the other way. We turn following desires into being the new heroism. So the person who lacks control, who lacks any ability to choose what they do rather than following their desires, is praised.

What this leads to socially is that if one is married, they no longer have any training in discipline, in remaining faithful to their spouses. Adultery becomes the next bar to ignore. We see that already in ‘open relationships’ or the like. What does this teach children? That this is normal, and good behaviour. In effect, what happens is they destroy the idea of marriage being exclusive. Although they may still claim to believe it, they disregard it in their actions. They are effectively lying to each other, and to themselves, with their body. People can not long live lying to themselves, and so eventually they are forced to choose between saying they believe in exclusivity through marriage or they do not. Almost inevitably, with this training in laxity and ill-discipline, they admit that they do not.

How does it attack them mentally, then? Simply by chemically brainwashing them. Oxytocin is the chemical released when one does something intimate with another person, from the least - eye contact - to the most - the marriage act. More than simply being a chemical that we note and that has little side effects, it serves to build a bond with the person with whom you are being intimate. When the relationship inevitably breaks, it leaves those bonds still in the brain chemically. Not only does this cause emotional pain, but it leaves you vulnerable. Like a chemical addiction, you can be left incapable of acting rationally. Couple this with the lack of discipline that is taught by such loose behaviour, and you leave a person in a sad state.

Now let us turn to the practical. Simply put, a person who engages in premarital sex has a higher chance of divorce. Whether the mass of divorce can be simply attributed to pre-marital sex or not is not determined, but it seems obvious that it is a factor. How this emerges is as an obvious trend of the first and second effects of premarital sex - firstly, a lack of discipline and training to resist desires and comfort in place of good, and secondly prior bonds that continue to pull on the person. If one is constantly thinking of a previous lover, and remembering the 'fun' and attraction, while knowing the undesirable traits of your spouse, your joy will be stolen by the comparison. Without the training to resist what you may feel, you will find it almost impossible to start with the adultery of the mind, and then later adultery in the flesh.

Why does this matter, though? One may say that the family is an obsolete unit, fit only for the past. It may have served its purpose then, but its purpose has long-such passed.

They are wrong.

When the United States of America wrote their constitution, a significant debate was held on the matter of the federal government and whether it should be able to raise an army. This was because the people, who had thrown off an oppressive regime, feared creating a new tyrant in its place. This was the purpose of the Second Amendment - to allow the people to form militias, to be armed and to train in the use of their weapons, so that should the government become a tyranny, they might resist it.

Key to this was the militia, the group. One man could not resist an army, and the people knew this. Together they could do so.

So it is with a family. The family not only forms a stable bond that one can rely on, but also provides a wide range of skills, talents, and experiences for a person to draw upon in need. What may be a problem for one may be easily solved by another. So it firstly provides support for a person in need. It is more than just that, however. It provides the learning ground for society, for morality, and every virtue. Even more so, it provides the building blocks of a society. In the family, the values of the culture - freedom, justice, fraternity - are demonstrated and lived out. Without the family, the culture falls, and so does the civilisation. To treat it as obsolete is the sign of folly, deception, or treason.

Western civilisation, the civilisation of liberty and reason, is under attack. From without by terrorists and rogue states, threatening liberty with the cause of security, and from within by the treason and sedition of the left. The deliberate separation of sex ad marriage is one of the key weapons of the traitors trying to bring the West down from within. Make no mistake - entering into this, promoting it or normalising it, ignoring it, or saying merely that it is just being 'young' and 'experimenting' is providing aid and comfort to the enemy.

No comments:

Post a Comment